In the first week of December, more than 52,000 OPSEU members of the OPSEU
Pension Trust received a four per cent hike in their before-tax income. Surprise payout
from a lottery ticket? Not quite. Income went up because employee contributions to their
pension plan went down.
Thats what happened this year when the Fund generated a surplus of $1.334
billion. The government took $667 million to pay down its liability (now a mere $153
million, slated to be paid off in 2003 at the latest); OPSEU surveyed its members to find
out how they wanted to spend their money. Following the guidance of over 12,000 plan
members who filled out surveys, the OPSEU Executive Board opted to give members a four per
cent raise for at least two years (through lower contributions), extend the Factor 80
retirement plan, and make other improvements.
A free gift from the employer? Not even slightly. The reduced contributions and better
pensions that kicked in Dec. 1 grew out of struggles that started over 30 years ago.
Pensions B.O. (Before OPSEU)
Once upon a time, Ontario government employees did not have a union. Most workers in
the Ontario Public Service belonged to an association the Civil Service Association
of Ontario (CSAO).
Association members had no real bargaining rights. Pay rates and benefits were
(basically) set by the employer, not through collective bargaining. Under the law, CSAO
members could not strike, take part in politics (except to vote), or bargain anything to
do with pensions.
Pension funds for OPS workers were the sole property of the government. The pension
money was being used as part of the general revenue fund of the province.
Many workers signed on with the government for the first time after the Second World
War. Time passed. Workers who were young in 1945 were not so young in 1970. As they got
older, and inflation picked up steam, they started thinking about pensions. They started
asking questions.
People were getting fed up. What it came down to was people waking up to the fact that
there was a whole pool of money over there and people were retiring.
Dont call me servant!
The members of CSAO, and later, OPSEU, began to realize that their pension dollars were
subsidizing the government - not securing their old age.
"Getting control" meant getting control of more than just pensions. It meant
full bargaining rights for public service workers. It meant political rights as citizens.
And it meant a campaign that lasted a quarter of a century.
During that time, Ontario premiers came and went. OPSEU presidents came and went. It
was a quarter-century of resolutions, lobbying, and rallies (including one that filled
Copps Coliseum in Hamilton). Finally, on Dec. 14, 1993, the New Democratic Party
government passed Bill 117, a full-scale re-write of the Crown Employees Collective
Bargaining Act (CECBA). Among the changes was the right to bargain pensions.
Both Liberals and Tories opposed the move; they wanted to keep public service pensions
cheap. "Its not in the public interest for the government to permit that
pensions be negotiable," Liberal MPP Elinor Caplan told the legislature.
Joint
control: the OPSEU Pension Trust
But bargaining pensions is in the interest of OPSEU members. Changes to CECBA opened
the door to negotiations on joint control in 1994.
"We knew joint control would pay off, but we also knew we werent going to
get it for free," says Len Hupet, OPSEU First Vice-President/Treasurer. In exchange
for setting up the OPSEU Pension Trust, the cash-strapped Rae government got a
contribution holiday worth $1 billion over three years.
The Trust began operation on Jan. 1, 1995, controlled by a board of five employer and
five union representatives.
Since then, growth of the Trust has averaged 16.4 per cent per year, far higher than
the rate needed to cover the Trusts liabilities. As a result, Trust assets are now
over $9 billion.
"We are now one of the top ten pension plans in Canada as far as rate of
return," says Hupet. "OPSEU members have an equal say in how that money is
invested, and how it is spent. Thats why we are now able to reduce contribution
rates for plan members and improve pensions at the same time."
The big payoff
Under the agreement set up to govern the OPT, any surplus is divided evenly between the
employer (the Ontario government) and the union.
Before 1995, the government had total control over pensions, so it also had complete
liability for them. Thats why the governments half of any surplus must go to
pay down that liability. The unions half of the surplus, however, can be used to
improve pensions, reduce member contributions, or both.