Ministry of Tourism

What people are saying


The following are excerpts from letters written to local newspapers or provincial politicians by people concerned about the changes to Upper Canada Village.

Time for a different kind of change at Upper Canada Village

Being born and raised in this area and having lived in one of the Lost Villages, Mille Roches, it greatly saddens me that the powers that be are disregarding our heritage all in the name of money.

This is "Upper Canada" village not Sherwood Forest! When was there ever jousting and knights in shining armour in Upper Canada?

The money being used to stage this event could be used to hire individuals who could explain what each building was used for and thus keep our local history alive. Children are going to grow up not knowing the actual history of our country. 

One of my ancestor’s homes is in Upper Canada Village. My father was baptized in the church. There are tombstones of my ancestors there. Would something like this be allowed to occur at Old Fort Henry? 

If need be, transfer control of Upper Canada Village to the Ministry of Culture instead of Tourism. Maybe then our heritage will be kept alive.

Susan Jamieson, Cornwall

 

Historical integrity of 'living museum' must be protected

I am disappointed with the changes that are taking place at Upper Canada Village under the direction of the St. Lawrence Parks Commission.

I am particularly concerned with the changes to the village's interpretive programming and the major cuts to the interpretation staff, the security of the village's historical collection, the lack of public consultation, and the introduction of new commercial ventures such as the Medieval Festival.

Upper Canada Village was established as a living history museum to preserve the heritage of Eastern Ontario not as a theme park.

I hope that the members of the St. Lawrence Park's Commission in their decision making will consult more fully with the community. I also hope that they will adhere to the Heritage Integrity Statement for Upper Canada Village which states that "the mission of Upper Canada Village is to display and interpret the 19th century architecture, economic, political, and social history of Eastern Ontario using buildings, landscapes, artifacts, reproductions, and living history methodology."

I now believe that Upper Canada Village should be moved from the jurisdiction of the Ontario Ministry of Tourism to the Ontario Ministry of Culture to ensure that its historical integrity is protected.

Brian Lynch, Cornwall, Ont.

 

Not for the better

I have read with interest the controversy surrounding the recent changes at Upper Canada Village. After a visit to the village recently I have to agree that the changes are NOT for the better.

The current management has promoted the changes as increasing the village's appeal but from what I saw the nature of Upper Canada Village is being seriously compromised.

Several of the buildings that I had wanted to see were closed to the public. One visitor I happened to chat with expressed disappointment that the recently added Masonic Lodge was closed as this was something she had come especially to see.

The decrease in the number of interpreters also made it impossible to ask many questions. The interpreters as always were courteous and knowledgeable but in "school field-trip season" interpreters working alone while valiantly attempting to deal with crowds of excited children, were often overwhelmed.

There are serious concerns here that must be dealt with. Beside from the obvious issue of visitors being disappointed and the potential of lost business, the decrease in staff raises questions of safety and high stress levels. There is also the possibility of theft of artifacts by visitors often wandering unattended.

So much of the history of this area was lost during the Seaway flooding. I just hope that this "living museum" meant to keep that history alive will not also be sacrificed to some vision of "progress."

Bonita Eley, Long Sault

Changes at Upper Canada Village have gone too far

Once upon a bunch of years ago I was given a fancy title and charged with developing and implementing new programming for Upper Canada Village. As Interpretive Entertainment Officer, my mandate was to simulate life in 1860s in order to stimulate attendance. I spent nearly 15 years happily preparing reenactments of weddings, funerals, baptisms, church services, theatrical productions and temperance meetings. Some people were leery at first of these innovations because 'that 's not the way we do it', but as time passed most accepted them as entertaining as well as instructive.

The day came, however, when someone decided it was time for a new direction yet again, and the programs were cancelled and we, who were most involved, were let go. We were not happy, nor were many regular visitors, but we did not stage protests or sign petitions because, though we felt it was not the wisest decision, we knew that it was their right to strive to tell the story their way.

When I heard that a new manager of the Commission was arriving from Toronto, I believed she too would have to face resistance because 'that is not the way we do it' and I was interested in seeing what new initiatives she would have to tell the story in a fresh way.

Imagine my surprise and dismay when it became apparent that she was changing the story itself. The introduction of a mediaeval festival was, to me, astounding. It seemed as though she felt that our own history was not interesting enough and I wondered what on earth the Commission was doing letting this go on.

It seems to me that the job of a Commissioner must be to protect and preserve the heritage of Eastern Ontario and the fact that they did not made me wonder and worry about the integrity of the site and the story.

This spring I began hearing about cutbacks in staff , which meant the cutting back on the dissemination of the story of our past. No matter what time of day a tourist or a school group arrived the buildings were manned ... and womaned... by someone who could tell the story and answer questions. Since most visits are just two to four hours it seems there is now no way that people will see all they want unless they are interested in half doors. Aaaagggghhhh!!!!

The rumour is that management was not too worried about protests because they were coming from 'disgruntled ex-employees.' That has been proven wrong by the outpouring of community support for an inquiry. I am an ex-employee but I was not disgruntled when I became ex....... I became this way when they showed disregard for the heritage we tried so hard to preserve. I will continue to 'gruntle' till someone listens.

 Jean Jeacle
Cornwall Standard Freeholder – June 2, 2009

 

With respect to the proposed changes within the Village itself, I have heard of plans to make Cook’s Tavern a working bar. Why anyone would want to alter one of the few original buildings from the 1820s left in Ontario to serve food and alcohol when there are already three food venues on site with two liquor licenses? …Why put a “Kettle Hut” in the middle of the Village to sell drinks and fudge when they are available at the Village Store? I could go on, but suffice to say, that these proposals would not only be a blatant waste of taxpayers’ money, but go against everything the Village represents. UCV is a world-renowned living museum, not some cheesy theme park.

Sonja Keeler
The Cornwall Standard-Freeholder

I am writing to express my most profound disappointment and disapproval of your recent action of firing the people who are the most important aspect of my beloved Upper Canada Village … For the past several years, I have been the first person to enter the village on opening day. I have a seasons pass and go the village several times a week during some weeks. I take any guests who come to visit me. ... I will not take them to the Village if those people are not there and I will tell everyone I can about the stupid short-sighted foolish decision that some bean counter decided was good business … Don’t destroy the best part of my heritage place, you foolish people.

Deborah Joidon
The Cornwall Standard-Freeholder

I’ve recently become aware of the changes being made at Upper Canada Village and I want to register my strong disagreement with them. As a public and high school student, I have fond memories of going to the village and actually gaining a sense of what life was like for my ancestors. As I got older, friends and I would go down with my son and I had a number of wonderful trips there … I’m in my 50s and this Village has been an important Canadian touchstone for me and my family. I’d like to take grandchildren there at some point. But these changes will make it very a different, and less enthralling trip. Please reconsider your plans. Stay true to the vision of the Village.

Janice Manchee

I am saddened and sickened by an article that appeared in the Standard-Freeholder … What it means is that certain ‘core’ workers at Upper Canada Village are losing their jobs. … My question is, why? How many people do you know who can make a barrel or shoe a horse? These are people who know the old life skills and ways of the pioneers. They are the informed practical historians who tell our story …. They come face to face with the public from Canada and all over the world on a daily basis. They are representatives of our heritage and the meaning of what Upper Canada Village is all about. …. I must say it contrasts very badly with the front page story of the $13 million about to be approved to enhance and improve the Village and Crysler’s Farm Battlefield Memorial site in readiness for the bicentennial celebrations of the War of 1812 …

Norma Peachey
The Cornwall Standard-Freeholder

Changing our village from a working living history book, and reducing it to a museum of empty buildings is just wrong! I urge everyone to contact our MPPs and express your concerns. …. It’s time to bail out a have-not part of the province and fund Upper Canada Village!

Steve Conroy
The Cornwall Standard-Freeholder

For the past two summers I have been employed by the St. Lawrence Parks Commission as a historical interpreter at Upper Canada Village. It has been my honour to help educate visitors, young and old, from across the globe, about the rich history of Canada just before we became a country. I will not, however, be spending this coming summer teaching children in the school house, demonstrating my beginner’s skill at sewing to a group from China, or joking in French with tourists from Montreal about our piglet horde invading the sitting room. … The decision to eliminate the bulk of the historical interpretation and do ‘more with less’ as stated to newspapers, is tarnishing the great effort all those who have come before have made to make Upper Canada Village a shining example of the past.

Kelsey Schmitz
The Cornwall Standard-Freeholder

You note that Michelin will be reviewing the historic re-enactment program at Morrisburg’s Upper Canada Village in its Canadian guidebook. …. They had better get there soon. This year, 24 of the village’s 92 seasonal re-enactment employees will not be hired back; instead there’ll be audio-visual presentations and faux events such as medieval festivals to turn what was once one of North America’s top historic tourist destinations into Disney World North.

Ian Bowering, Curator, Stormont, Dundas & Glengarry Museum/Archives
The Globe and Mail

 

 


Ontario Public Service Employees Union, 100 Lesmill Rd. Toronto, ON M3B 3P8  (416) 443-8888

Questions about technical content or comments on this site may be directed to the webmaster

DISCLAIMER,  COPYRIGHT AND TRADE MARKS

News | How to join OPSEU | OPS | Health Care | Social ServicesGeneral | Liquor BoardContact Us | Francais

Produced by OPSSU