Ontario Public Service Corrections
 

You are hereHome > OPS > Ministry >Correctional Services

Private Adult Correctional Facilities: Fines, Failures and Dubious Practices  Index

 5. New Zealand’s policy reversal
  
The Labour-Alliance Government of New Zealand has swept aside the former administration’s prison privatisation plans for five new prisons and seven specialist youth facilities. The Government is, however, honouring Australasian Correctional Management’s (ACM) recently awarded five year contract to run the new Auckland Central Remand Prison. The prison is due to open in June 2000. But Matt Robson, Minister of Corrections, has warned ACM that they should not expect “a long life in this field.”

Prior to the election in November 1999, the Department of Corrections had predicted that the prison population would rise by more than 40 per cent a year by 2010. The former administration had planned to put all new facilities out to tender. While the latter are under development, the plan for new prisons is now being reviewed.

In a statement on 17 January 2000, Mr. Robson said that “There has been an experiment overseas - driven by ideology - to introduce private prisons and it hasn’t worked. The ideology-driven belief that ... private is better is not suited to our prisons, and this government won’t let New Zealanders become guinea pigs for an experiment here.”

He admitted that the present public system was failing but claimed that this was due to the legacy of the former administration. He said that the solution was “not private” but “resourcing the New Zealand system to do its job properly.” He added that, “at the end of the day, we don’t want prisons to be a growth industry. We want the need for prisons to decrease by putting resources into crime prevention.”

The Corrections Association of New Zealand, which represent some 80 per cent of the country’s prison officers, said that ACM’s contract had an exit clause for the government. But Mr. Robson said that “it was clear that the cost of withdrawing from the former government’s contract could not be fully quantified. The advice we received could not give us a firm guarantee that the costs could be accurately predicted. The government could have been dragged into a lengthy and costly legal process, and we are not prepared to take that risk with taxpayers money. We have to put this behind us now, and will get on with developing the best run public prisons, staffed by the best people for the job. My priority is to develop prisons that take in offenders and return them after sentence as safe members of our community. Prisons will not become a growth industry under this government. Crime prevention will.”73

Index

 

 

 

Ontario Public Service Employees Union, 100 Lesmill Rd. Toronto, ON M3B 3P8  (416) 443-8888  www.opseu.org