|
|
You
are here: Home > OPS
> Ministry >Mar 23 2001
LockTalk
March 23, 2001
Relocation settlement signed at last
After months of negotiation, an implementation agreement has finally been
reached for members who worked at the Haileybury Jail, Cobourg Jail and L’Orignal
Jail.
In the Jan. 26, 2000 Lock Talk, we reported the win at the
Grievance Settlement Board. It was then up to the union to negotiate the nuts
and bolts of implementing the settlement.
Under the award, L’Orignal correctional officers are entitled to nine (9)
full-time positions at Ottawa-Carleton D.C., Haileybury correctional officers
are entitled to three (3) positions at Monteith C.C and two (2) positions at
North Bay Jail, and Cobourg correctional officers are entitled to two (2)
positions at Peterborough Jail, one (1) position at Lindsay Jail and seven (7)
positions at Quinte D.C.
The implementation agreement will see all correctional officers who were
surplussed at the three jails being given the option (based on seniority) to
take one of the available positions at the specific facilities identified. Only
the officers who are chosen to fill the slots will be eligible, depending on
their specific circumstances, to relocation expenses.
The settlement also provides that no employees at the receiving facilities
will be surplussed as a result of this agreement.
Barry Scanlon, chair of the OPSEU Corrections Ministry Employee Relations
Committee, is satisfied with the outcome.
“It was difficult to try to make members whole when so many left the
Ministry or moved to other places,” Scanlon said. “It was like trying to put
a broken egg back in the shell. I believe this settlement is as fair as we could
achieve for our members.”
OPSEU will provide a question and answer sheet to the affected members
shortly. Copies of the implementation agreement are available from OPSEU Head
Office. Contact Mary-Anne DiAdamo at ext. 664.
The threats continue
Well, we long suspected that Norm wasn’t a quick study.
It would appear that bad habits are hard to break, especially when it comes
to threatening municipal councils that oppose the Tory vision. Former
Corrections Minister Norm Sterling sent a lovely little nasty-gram to the City
of St. Thomas for having the audacity to oppose private jails in Ontario.
In the Dec. 22, 2000 letter, Sterling says, “...I can only
conclude that your Council, having carefully considered this matter on behalf of
your community, has determined that it does not wish to have correctional
facilities located within the boundaries of your municipality. Our government
can certainly respect that local wish. I will take steps to make your
determination of this issue a matter of record, and ensure that no planning for
future correctional institutional investments in the City of St. Thomas will
occur.”
Nice, Norm. Did anyone at your office share with you what the reactions have
been from other councils that got that letter? The letters have been, to put it
mildly, not well received.
We’re sure that economic blackmail is not one of the planks on the Tories
re-election platform.
Resolution watch
One more step towards the big 200.
The Township of Himsworth South (south of North Bay) has added their
support for publicly run correctional services.
This brings the count to 197. The work of the Resolution Warrior, Len Mason
of Local 737 (Thunder Bay Jail), continues to pay off big dividends. Just three
more, Len!
This would be a good time to remind ALL locals to get it in gear and start
lobbying your councils. This should be a province-wide effort, not the solo
project of one dedicated activist. Contact Don Ford at Head Office if you
require information.
Counter-Spat!
Clear TV victory for anti-privatization
CBC Newsworld’s Monday night telecast of Counterspin at times
resembled a loosely controlled street brawl.
Pro and anti-privatization forces met live on camera to debate the planned
privatization of Ontario’s jails. There was no doubt by the end of the program
who was clearly in the right. And it wasn’t those who favored going private.
MERC chair Barry Scanlon squared off against MPP Bob Wood, parliamentary
assistant to Corrections Minister Rob Sampson. Pro and anti-privatization
experts from the U.S., appearing via satellite, rounded off the panel.
Wood was rattled early in the telecast as he attempted to parry comments made
by Scanlon. However, the Tory party line just didn’t hold up under fire,
especially with a studio filled with anti-privatization supporters, including
OPSEU president Leah Casselman and First Vice President/Treasurer Len Hupet.
Under questioning, Wood finally admitted that the young offenders sent to
Camp Turnaround (the privatized boot camp north of Barrie) were “cherry-picked”
from the system. Wood also admitted that there were no statistics to prove
whether or not the boot camp has been successful.
But it was Wood’s comments on the effectiveness of the programs at the
Ontario Correctional Institute (OCI) that landed him in a minefield. When
Scanlon pointed out that OCI was being closed by the Ministry despite winning
awards from the American Correctional Association for its exceptional inmate
programming, Wood said, “the results at OCI just aren’t there.” When
Scanlon asked if the Ministry was planning to return the award, Wood was stumped
for an answer.
Wood’s comments, however, have sparked an angry reaction from members of
Local 229 (OCI). The following letter was written to Sampson this week from
Local 229 president John Hasted:
As the OPSEU Local 229 Union President - representing the Ontario
Correctional Institute in Brampton, Ontario -I am writing to express the great
shock arising from erroneous statements made by your parliamentary aide, Mr. Bob
Wood, on the television program Counterspin which aired on March 19, 2001. These
statements demonstrated an utter disregard and lack of understanding and
appreciation for the hard work and accomplishments of your Ministry's employees
to ensure a safer community.
Of particular concern to the front-line, professional and management staff at
the Ontario Correctional Institute were the uninformed and demoralizing
statements Mr. Wood made when questioned by Mr. Barry Scanlon of OPSEU about the
rationale for closing the well-established and effective OCI treatment facility.
Mr. Wood replied, "the results are simply not there" - despite the
fact that OCI has clearly demonstrated its effectiveness in reducing recidivism
throughout its 25 year history. When challenged further and presented with the
fact that OCI recently won a prestigious award from the American Correctional
Association for providing the most effective treatment programming in North
America, Mr. Wood made further misinformed statements and continued to disregard
the meaningfulness of this fact.
While it was clear to those who work at OCI that Mr. Wood was clearly
misrepresenting the facts and had no basis for his statements, the viewing
public would be left to wonder and mistakenly conclude that there is no
effective treatment for the correctional population. This is patently untrue! A
simple phone call to OCI's Research Department to obtain research data would
have provided extensive evidence of the effectiveness of OCI's programming. As
your parliamentary aide and a senior representative of the Ministry of
Correctional Services, one would think that Mr. Wood would at least have the
integrity to properly prepare himself before the interview in order to get his
facts straight. To have done less than prepare himself has resulted in the
dissemination of false information, thus disrespecting the already demoralized
and under-acknowledged staff of this reputable facility. The staff of OCI feel
that they deserve an apology as well as a formal and public retraction of the
statements made by Mr. Wood, in order to begin to rectify this situation. As Mr.
Wood's supervisor, I am asking you to initiate this process.
Mr. Sampson, it is my understanding that you and many of your Deputy
Ministers have toured OCI and have been personally impressed with the quality
and effectiveness of the treatment provided to this very needy and difficult
client population. It is also my understanding that the documented effectiveness
of OCI led to the decision to transfer and expand the program at the new
Brockville location. How then can Mr. Wood justify bashing and undermining OCI
while the Ministry is concurrently spending many millions of dollars to transfer
its valuable programming to another location? Common sense would suggest that
millions of taxpayer dollars would not be spent to transfer a useless program.
As the Minister responsible for Correctional Services, how can you explain this
apparent hypocrisy?
As the Local 229 Union President, it is incumbent upon me to relay the
disappointment, anger and frustration felt by the many dedicated staff of OCI
who daily work to maintain the effectiveness of this highly praised and
respected program, despite severe resource cutbacks and the looming reality of
job loss for those who cannot move to Brockville. I hope that you will respond
to my request for redress and clarification and ensure that any future public
statements regarding OCI accurately and fairly represent the valuable work done
to reduce recidivism - thus saving taxpayers money and increasing public safety.
Well said, John. We are all anxious to see how Mr. Sampson replies.
For campaign information, call Don Ford (ext. 442) or Pam Doig (ext. 687)
at 1-800-268-7376 or (416) 443-8888.
e-mail: dford@opseu.org
or pdoig@opseu.org
. Ontario Public Service Employees Union
100 Lesmill Road, Toronto, Ontario M3B 3P8
www.opseu.org
opseu@opseu.org
Original authorized for distribution by Leah Casselman, president.
Return to top of page
|

|
Previous Issues
Mar
16, 2001
Mar
9, 2001
Mar
2, 2001
Feb
23, 2001 Feb
16, 2001
Feb
13, 2001
Feb
9, 2001
Feb
2, 2001
Jan
26, 2001
Jan
19, 2001
Jan
12, 2001
Jan
5, 2001
Dec
19, 2000
Dec
15, 2000
Dec
8, 2000
Dec 1, 2000
Nov 28, 2000
Nov 24, 2000
Nov 22, 2000
Nov 17, 2000
Nov 10, 2000
Nov 3, 2000
Oct 27, 2000
Oct 20, 2000
Oct 13, 2000
Oct. 6, 2000
Sept. 29, 2000
Sept. 22, 2000
Sept. 15, 2000
Sept. 8, 2000
Sept. 1, 2000
Aug 25, 2000
Aug 18, 2000
Aug 11, 2000
Aug 4, 2000
July 28, 2000
July 20, 2000
July 14, 2000
July 7, 2000
June 30, 2000
June 23, 2000
June 16, 2000
June 9, 2000
June 2, 2000
May 26/00
May 19/00
May 12/00
May 5/00
Apr 28/00
Apr 20/00
Apr 14/00
Apr 12/00
Mar
31/00
Mar
24/00
Mar
17/00
Mar 14/00
Mar
10/00
Mar 3/00
Mar 2/00
Feb
25/00
Feb
18/00
Feb 11/00
Feb
4/00
Jan 28/00
Jan 24/00
Jan 21/00
Jan 14/00
Jan 07/00
Dec 30/99
Dec 23,/99
Dec 17/99
Dec 10/99
Dec 3/99
Nov 19/99
|
|
|