|
June 15, 2001
Tories squirm as members speak out on
Bill 25

One
hour and 55 minutes.
That’s how long the public hearings into
Bill 25 lasted.
Introduced April 30, Bill 25 could have a big
effect on OPSEU members in the Ontario Public Service. It will let
the government create a new kind of “term classified” contract
worker. It will let private operators be the boss of government
employees. It will let more people view OPS employees’ personnel
files. And it will give
the Ontario Provincial Police Association a chance to absorb 2,500
OPSEU members.
The
hearings took place in Toronto on June 13. Despite short notice,
OPSEU members came out in force. Denis Perreault, president of Local
364, was joined by Marg Simmons, chair of the OPSEU bargaining team
in the OPS; team vice-chair Mark Kotanen; and four chairs of OPSEU
Ministry Employee Relations Committees: Alicia Czekierda
(Education), Terry Downey (Citizenship), Ron Marciniak (Municipal
Affairs and Housing), and Doug Peebles (Agriculture and Food).
OPSEU president Leah Casselman had government
MPPs squirming in their seats from the start.
“I leave it to you to decide how embarrassed
you should be,” she told them. “Bill 25 concerns a public
institution that directs the spending of $64 billion every year. At
another time in this province, a Bill of this sort would have been
the subject of weeks of hearings.”
Casselman accused the government MPPs of “profound
disrespect” for the public service.
“The good of the people”
Ron Marciniak led off with a stirring ode to
the power of an impartial, accountable public service.
“I have been a member of the Ontario Public
Service for nine years,” he said. “In those nine years my work
has been led by experienced, responsible senior public servants,”
he said. “We understand, all of us, the balance between
responsible fiscal stewardship and the delivery of services and
programs. It is our business. We are all accountable. We do not
always agree with the direction our political leaders wish to take,
but as Dwight D. Eisenhower said, ‘Never confuse honest dissent
with disloyal subversion.’”
Marciniak followed with a blistering attack on
new rules in Bill 25 that give authority over public services to
private operators.
“I am at a loss as to how the citizens of
this province will benefit with having the powers and authority of
trusted public servants given to ‘another person or persons’ who
do not share our vision of service without profit,” he said.
“The basic economic principles of supply and
demand have no place in the public service. We do not close up and
leave town if our services are not making money; our services must
continue to be available to those who need them.
“We, all of us, are responsible for Cicero’s
greatest law: ‘the good of the people.’”
Privacy
at risk
Terry Downey got into a spirited debate with
Tory MPP Marilyn Mushinski over the way Bill 25 will broaden access
to employee records, including medical records.
“To allow any individual access to an
employee’s medical information without consent is discriminatory
and a violation of the Human Rights Code,” Downey said. “The
Code has primacy over all other legislation. The government should
not be breaking its own law.”
Downey demanded privacy safeguards if the Bill
is passed.
Food
safety at risk
Doug Peebles’ presentation was an eye-opener
as well.
Bill 25 will give the government more options
for using contract staff. Peebles said that replacing Ontario’s
full-time classified meat inspectors with contract staff has put
food safety at risk. Wages and working conditions for these 130
contract staff are so bad that few that take the job keep it for
long. These “fee-for-service” workers even have to invoice the
government to get paid, Peebles said.
“The supply of safe meat to your families is
contingent on this temporary, inexperienced work force,” he said.
“In a recent MERC meeting, we asked Ministry
management about… the high rate of meat inspector turnover. They
indicated that it was a serious problem for them.
“In the past five-six years we have
repeatedly cautioned the employer about the revolving door, the gaps
in service, and the likelihood of public health being threatened due
to the lack of experienced classified staff.”
Peebles’ remarks hit home with Liberal MPP
Marie Bountrogianni. “The whole time you’re talking, I’ve got
Walkerton on my mind,” she said.
A slamming door
Denis Perreault spoke at length of
the Bill’s bias in favour of the OPPA. Bill 25 deviates from
standard labour relations practice, Perreault said.
“The bias is really clear when you
consider the fact that, if a majority of OPP civilians vote to join
the OPPA, Bill 25 will not allow them to ever vote again if they
change their minds. So much for democracy!” he said.
“The government is selling Bill 25
to OPP civilians as a door opening. In reality, it is a door that
opens once - and then slams shut forever.”
Changes still possible
MPPs have until the end of Friday,
June 15 to present amendments to Bill 25. Those amendments, if any,
will be voted on when the General Government Committee meets next.
Bill 25 will then go to final reading in the legislature.
Find out more
For more information on Bill
25, check the OPSEU web site at http://www.opseu.org/ops/bargaining/index.htm.
For the full text of Leah
Casselman’s remarks to the Standing Committee on General
Government, go to http://www.opseu.org/campaign/bill25speakingnotes.htm.
To view OPSEU’s detailed
submission to the Committee, go to http://www.opseu.org/campaign/bill25submission.htm.
A full transcript of the
remarks at yesterday’s Committee meeting should be available on
the Legislative web site within a few days. Go to http://www.ontla.on.ca/hansard/committee_debates
/37_parl/Session2/gengov/index.htm
to read it.
Produced by the Ontario Public Service Employees Union, 100 Lesmill Road, Toronto M3B 3P8.
Web: www.opseu.org; e-mail: opseu@opseu.org.
Original authorized for distribution by Leah Casselman, president.
|