The cost of repetitive strain injuries in Ontario: $380 million
and three million lost work days over eight years
February 27, 2009
As injured workers and labour groups in Ontario today mark
International Repetitive Strain Injury Awareness Day they are calling on
Queen’s Park to introduce ergonomic regulations to force employers to
introduce workplace prevention measures.
“In Ontario the only thing that changes from year-to-year is
the increasing number of workers who are afflicted with RSI,” said Catherine
Fenech, a Toronto-area member of the Ontario Public Service Employees Union
and health and safety activist who founded RSI Day 10 years ago.
“What remains the same is our provincial government’s
inaction in the face of a physical illness that affects one in 10 workers.
In fact, many of these injuries go unreported so actual numbers are greater
than WSIB statistics,” she added.
“It is totally unacceptable that it’s the injured workers
themselves who suffer the brunt of the hardship and poverty that the costs
of these debilitating injuries create.”
To add weight to the seriousness of the problem the City of
Toronto has proclaimed Feb. 27 Repetitive Stress Injury Awareness Day.
The RSI committee estimates that between 1996 and 2004
Ontario averaged 42,500 lost time claims per year which translates into
three million lost work days during that period. In turn that amounted to an
economic loss to the province of $380 million.
With the province facing tough economic times Ontario can
hardly afford to lose this kind of economic activity. By introducing
ergonomic regulations the province can at the least begin to slow down the
economic losses it is experiencing.
As on previous anniversaries of RSI Awareness Day, Fenech’s
group is calling on Queen’s Park to introduce legislation to deal with this
serious issue.
“British Columbia and Saskatchewan have ergonomic
regulations to protect workers from these injuries. The federal government
also provides specific protection for its employees from ergonomic hazards.
Yet in Ontario there is no legislation that specifically targets the largest
groups of occupational injury claims,” said Fenech.
Between April 1, 2007 and March 31, 2008 only 4.5 per cent
of MoL field visits had an ergonomic component. And of those visits (4,554),
orders were only written in 10 per cent of those cases. Put another way,
only 494 Ministry orders of a total of 176, 669 in 2007-08 were based on
ergonomics.
“Enacting ergonomic regulations in Ontario would help
step-up Ministry of Labour enforcement to prevent these crippling injuries,”
said Fenech.
More information:
Catherine Fenech
Chair, Toronto RSI Committee
416-333-9428 cell
Greg Hamara
OPSEU Communications
647-238-9933 cell