Privatization a bad deal for Ontarians
Toronto Star: March 10, 2010
Erin Weir
Download Article
This week's provincial throne speech indicated that
Queen's Park has "initiated a review of its business enterprises."
The Ontario government is reportedly considering
combining these enterprises into a "super corporation" and selling a
minority stake to private investors. This proposal is politically
clever, but would be a financial blunder for the province.
The super corporation would apparently include
Ontario Lottery and Gaming, the Liquor Control Board of Ontario,
Hydro One and Ontario Power Generation. The main objections to
privatizing these Crown corporations are that they provide a steady
stream of revenue and control socially important assets.
The governing Liberals have tried to avoid these
objections by musing about selling only a minority stake. The
province would retain control of the assets and a majority of the
revenue that they generate.
An important concern is that such partial
privatization could be a slippery slope toward a more complete
sell-off. Even if one believes that the Liberal government would
never sell more than half of the super corporation's shares,
establishing this entity and issuing shares would make it easy for a
possible future Conservative government to finish the job.
In at least temporarily avoiding the worst pitfalls
of privatization, the Liberals would also miss the supposed upside.
Privatization is usually intended to replace public-sector
management with allegedly superior private-sector management free
from political constraints. Selling a minority stake would not
change management.
The super corporation would mainly just convert a
portion of future revenues from Crown corporations into upfront
cash. Essentially, the government is considering a reverse mortgage:
it would get a large dollop of one-time money and retain control of
the house, but lose some ownership.
The throne speech pledged that the government "will
use the proceeds to better support Ontarians' highest priorities."
Obviously, all provincial funds should be used to support Ontarians'
priorities. The real question is whether the proceeds of selling
shares in government enterprises would exceed the proceeds of
keeping all the revenues from these enterprises.
The Star has reported a value between $50 billion
and $60 billion for the super corporation. Selling one-third of the
shares based on a $50 billion valuation would raise $16.7 billion
(minus hefty Bay Street fees). With long-term provincial bonds
paying just under 5 per cent interest, reducing current borrowing by
the full $16.7 billion would lower future debt-servicing costs by
$800 million per year.
On the other hand, Ontario's Crown corporations are
expected to generate profits of $4.3 billion this fiscal year.
Giving up one-third would reduce provincial revenues by more than
$1.4 billion. If the super corporation were subject to provincial
corporate tax, the scheduled 10 per cent rate would recoup $140
million. Still, annual provincial revenues would be $1.3 billion
lower.
The government would lose more than $3 of revenue
for every $2 saved on debt servicing. In total, Ontario taxpayers
would come out half a billion dollars poorer every year.
Just to break even, the provincial government would
need to value its super corporation at more than $70 billion. But
private investors would not accept such a valuation.
Those who want a steady return of nearly 5 per cent
can simply buy long-term provincial bonds. Prospective investors in
government enterprises would clearly expect more. If investors could
not increase profits by taking over management, the only way to
achieve a higher return would be to buy shares based on a lower
initial valuation.
Furthermore, the stock market generally discounts
conglomerates relative to pure plays. Many investors might be
interested in sectors like liquor retailing or electricity
transmission. Far fewer would be interested in an unwieldy
hodgepodge of different enterprises concentrated in a single
province.
The government would reportedly limit the number of
super-corporation shares held by any single investor and by all
foreign investors. Such restrictions may serve legitimate
public-policy goals, but would further reduce the field of potential
buyers and hence the likely sale price.
Under the Constitution, one level of government
cannot tax another. Provincial Crown corporations pay no federal
corporate tax. If the super corporation were subject to federal tax,
its profits would be less than those of existing provincial
enterprises.
To justify the risks of even partial privatization,
the government should be expected to demonstrate significant
rewards. In fact, the province would lose more than it would gain by
selling shares in a super corporation. The people of Ontario would
be better served by maintaining public ownership of our Crown
corporations.
Erin Weir is an economist with the United
Steelworkers union.